Publications

This publication, written in association with Uganda Victims Foundation, seeks to provide insight into the barriers faced by Ugandans in seeking redress following the terrible impact of the Lango War. The report details the treatment of these cases within the International Criminal Court, the response of the Ugandan government to these cases, and the current problems facing Uganda's socio-economic programmes in the greater north, including programme such as NAADS, NUSAF 1, PRDP and NUSAF II.

This briefing paper - co-authored by Redress and several partner organisations - raises serious concerns about Clause 154 of the Police Reform and Social Bill, which would require the Director of Public Prosecutions’s (DPP’s) consent before an arrest warrant could be issued for an international crime such as torture, war crimes or crimes against humanity. Not only would this undermine the criminal justice system to hold accountable perpetrators of such crimes who live in or visit the UK, it would signal to the international community that the UK is no longer committed to ending impunity for international crimes. If the House wishes to give the DPP a greater role in the arrest warrant procedure, we recommend the amendment to Clause 154 proposed by Baroness D’Souza, Lord Lester of Herne Hill and Baroness Tonge. This would give the DPP the opportunity to advise the court upon the issuing of the warrant but would not require his consent to its being issued.

Redress has submitted an open letter to the Foreign Affairs Committee, following an invitation to participate in the FAC's annual inquiry into the human rights work of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. This letter focuses on the 2010 Foreign and Commonwealth Office Report, 'Human Rights and Democracy'. This report clearly evidences the problems posed in condemning torture within countries whom are allied with the UK, such as Suadi Arabia, which has a history of torturing British Citizens. Sir Emyr recommends that the report put greater focus on the issue of torture in such countries as an ongoing and systematic problem, and calls for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to take a more consistent approach when drawing attention towards torture practices abroad, in order to be universally consistent on the UK's anti-torture obligations.

This report was submitted to the International Criminal Court in order to aid reflection on what reparation means and should mean in the context of mass atrocity. The report examines the shortcomings of the existing normative framework for reparations of international crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court, comparing it to various international and domestic frameworks. The report also refers to lessons learnt on reparations at the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia. The report also examines the respective roles of the judges’ Chambers, the Registry and the Prosecutor’s Office in ensuring victim-sensitive policies to allow for the effective discharge of their respective functions.

Our annual report for 2011 provides an overview of the work that REDRESS undertook from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2012.

This report presents constructive observations to the Board of Directors of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims (TFV) concerning the discrete areas that may pose particular challenges should the Chambers order reparation in the Lubanga case. The observations set out below are presented in the spirit of ongoing collaboration, and we hope that they are useful to the Board in the fulfillment of its objectives. We remain committed to working with the Board and the Secretariat to realise their important mandate to assist victims of the most serious crimes of concern to humanity.  

The joint letters from REDRESS to the French Ministry of Justice concern the current issues surrounding prosecution of War Criminals within France, and the length of time it takes to carry out proceedings, particularly in the case of the 1994 Rwanda Genocide. From observing the way past cases have been handled, REDRESS recommends the creation of a specialised class of judicial personnel, whom are able to best understand the issues and the regions involved in the cases, with a knowledge of international law, that they can best use to reach timely decisions, reducing some of the issues that lead to lengthy procedures. Les lettres conjointes de REDRESS au ministère français de la Justice concernent les questions actuelles  entourant les poursuites contre les criminels de guerre en France et le temps qu'il faut pour mener à bien les procédures, en particulier dans le cas du génocide rwandais de 1994. En observant la façon dont les cas passés ont été traités, REDRESS recommande la création d'un personnel judiciaire spécialisé, capable de comprendre au mieux les problèmes et les régions impliqués dans les affaires, avec une connaissance du droit international, qu'ils peuvent utiliser au mieux pour atteindre décisions opportunes, réduisant certaines des questions qui mènent à de longues procédures.