Publications

Lawyers for Justice in Libya (LFJL), REDRESS, DIGNITY and the World Organization against Torture (OMCT) provided these preliminary comments on the Draft Law Criminalising Torture, Enforced Disappearances and Torture in Libya, which was approved on 9 April 2013. The Draft Law attempts to criminalise three distinct crimes either fully (the first two) or partially (the third) recognised in international treaties: torture, enforced disappearances and discrimination. An issue of concern for the organisations is that by attempting to address these three significant human rights crimes in one piece of legislation, the law risks confusing or oversimplifying the specific obligations they impose. Another shortcoming in the law is the narrow definition of torture in it, which is not in accordance with the UN Convention Against Torture, to which Libya is a State party.

The Victims Rights Working Group (VRWG), a network of civil society groups and experts informally facilitated by REDRESS, shared these remarks ahead of discussions on the issue of intermediaries, which took place in the context of the Facilitation on Victims and Affected Communities and Trust Fund for Victims, including reparations, on 13 March 2013 in The Hague.

REDRESS made these observations to the Board of the Trust Fund for Victims in light of the International Criminal Court's first decision on reparations in the case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga, rendered on 7 August 2012. The observations focus on the Trust Fund’s mandate in relation to reparation, exploring issues concerning how implementation of reparations fits into the Court’s overall mandate.

This report was submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in March 2013. It concludes that measures taken by Peru to prevent and combat torture have been inadequate. This includes the lack of a national registry of complaints for acts of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, the lack of effective investigations, and the lack of prosecutions for torture. A number of factors contribute to this worrying trend such as the lack of protection for victims, and the lack of independence and impartiality of investigations into torture. As highlighted in this section, victims of torture in Peru have not received adequate reparation. This also applies to Peru’s administrative reparation programme which, among other issues, fails to take into account the individual circumstances of each victim’s case.

Women and girls victims of human rights violations continue to face numerous challenges in accessing justice. REDRESS and the Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn for Africa (SIHA) recently made a submission to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) to draw attention to the many barriers faced by women, including the impact of customary systems of law. The expert body on women’s human rights is drafting a general recommendation on the topic, and our submission will be considered as part of that process.

Torture often targets the vulnerable in society, and in many circumstances migrants fall under that category. REDRESS and the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT) have made a submission to the Committee on Migrant Workers on the rights of migrant workers and their families in irregular situations. The submission highlights the particular vulnerability of migrant workers to torture and ill-treatment, both at the hands of their employers and the state, and brings attention to states' obligations to provide redress to victims of torture and ill-treatment.  

A look back on REDRESS' 20-year history with a detailed timeline on key cases, special events and publications.